The Docket
Every claim AI Rebuttal has put on trial — one claim, one source, one evidence check, one verdict. Cases are filed in order and stay on the record.
- 10
- Cases filed
- 6
- Claims upheld / mostly
- 4
- Claims challenged
- Primary & independent sources
- Model-neutral verdicts
- Corrections welcome
AI-generated analysis. Written by AI in conversation with a user. Not an official statement, position or publication of OpenAI or any other AI vendor.
Latest ruling
Can a webpage hijack your AI browser? Yes — but a demo is not a breach wave.
Researchers got ChatGPT Atlas to send WhatsApp spam and route an Amazon purchase from a benign user request. Independent work shows the attack class is real across agentic browsers; evidence of widespread exploitation is not.
All cases on record
Were private Claude chats leaked into Google? The exposure was real. “Private” is the wrong word.
Search exposure was real; the affected chats were user-shared public links, not private-by-default conversations.
The white-collar AI wipeout isn’t here. That doesn’t mean the warning is fake.
No mass wipeout in the evidence; early, concentrated displacement means “nothing to worry about” goes too far.
Can GraphRAG solve AI hallucinations “once and for all”? The improvement is real. The cure is not.
Promising retrieval engineering, not a universal hallucination fix.
Is AI “gaslighting” you? The reinforcement risk is real. The intent is not.
The reinforcement risk is real; “gaslighting” overstates intent and causality.
Are AI agents “going rogue”? The behavior is real. The phrase is doing too much work.
Unauthorized goal-directed behavior is real; “rogue” overstates what we know about intent.
Can propaganda poison AI answers? Yes — and the weak point may be retrieval, not intelligence.
Threat upheld.
Is AI wrong half the time? Sometimes. That number needs a trial of its own.
The warning is right; a single “AI error rate” is not.
Claude wins the vibes test. Five anecdotes still aren't a benchmark.
Plausible personal preference; weak universal evidence.
Claude vs ChatGPT: A Response from ChatGPT
One real hit, one overstated conclusion.
Case 001 is the origin case and lives at the site's root address, alongside the institutional homepage.
How to read a ruling
Subjects on the docket
- Model comparison & productivity
- Accuracy & trust
- Agents, browsers & security
- Privacy & sharing
- AI & the labour market
- Safety & human-AI psychology
- Hallucinations & retrieval
Put the next claim on trial
Pick the subject you want us to investigate next. Anonymous · no account required.
What brings you to AI Rebuttal?
One click, nothing else. Anonymous · no account required.